|
Lensk15 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
im sure this is frickin small compared to what we have now....
*sigh* why didn't we just send in chuck norris into japan :(
tdaly69 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Dude, I'm not sure, but whatever they use it's gonna be big.
Juh-kay. You're crazy.
qwertical (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm sure but doesn't US and Russia have bigger nukes nowdays in their silos? This just the biggest ever tested.
dandamanwitdaplan92 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
but the fact the acocalypse can come from them is a bad thing.if we didnt have nucleur weapons we wouldnt have to have that as a possiblity so nukes arent a good thing
conman2317 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
HOLY FUCKING SHIT THAT HUGE!!!!!!!!!!
I wonder if the UNKOWN's (shall I call them), will use the same on the U.S major cities in July 3 2010????????? only respond if you know what I'm talking about
jbee02 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Whether the invention of the atomic bomb was a good thing or not depends on whether the Apocalypse is brought on by the atomic bomb or not. If apocalypse comes but not because of Nuclear war, then nukes were a good thing.
roberto123yeah (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
because 1 of those dropped on, say, baghdad, would pretty much annihilate the whole middle east, parts of eastern africa and south eastern europe
roberto123yeah (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Everyone should vote for themselves and live free enough to work for the things he or she wants because it is really anyone's guess who or how things should be done."
are you not sort of hinting at anarchy there?
Kinneballer36 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
God damn hippie...
BenderBurgers (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
There goes Slim Pickens. yee haaw! |